LAB TOPIC / EDITORIAL WORKFLOWS
Editorial workflows connect automated suggestions with human judgment, corrections, and publishing needs. Explore topic assignment, story grouping, source context, and review queues. A useful system should help an editor understand and change a label without losing the record of why it was applied.
2 CONNECTED ARTICLES
Use these articles to walk through a correction that changes a story's subject or location. Identify who reviews the new evidence, which assignment is replaced, and which subject pages should update. Then check the repeated copies and translated versions connected to the original. Ask whether the publishing workflow can display the current account while retaining enough history to explain an earlier label.
Read the taxonomy and deduplication guides together when choosing what an editor sees in a queue. A suggested topic, a possible duplicate, and a proposed story-cluster merge require different decisions. Show the evidence and the consequence of accepting each suggestion. A useful outcome is a short review checklist with an owner, an accepted state, and a correction path for each type of change, supported by examples from your own publishing practice.
Repeated posts can make one story look like many independent signals. Learn how to separate activities, content objects, and story clusters, then report observed topic patterns with clear sampling limits and evidence.
Read the article : Separate Social Topic Signals from Repeated Posts
News changes quickly, but a useful subject vocabulary needs continuity. Learn how to separate topics from sections and entities, handle evolving stories, map external vocabularies, and give editors clear rules for everyday classification.
Read the article : Build a news topic taxonomy that survives the next news cycle